Scaling Experimentation Into Revenue

Overview
Over the past several years, I worked within Myer’s centralised Optimisation team, operating as part of a structured experimentation program powered by Dynamic Yield. The program functioned as a growth engine across e-commerce, driving conversion rate uplift, personalisation, and measurable commercial outcomes.
The FY25 Executive Report shows the scale of the program, delivering $42.2m in 12-month projected revenue across 45 tests, exceeding the $38.1m annual target (111% of target achieved)
This wasn’t isolated A/B testing. It was a systematic, commercially accountable optimisation program.
The program also became Myer's proving ground for AI, from machine-learning personalisation to a generative AI shopping assistant pilot, always judged on commercial evidence rather than hype.
Problem Framing
As the program matured, the challenge shifted.
Early “quick wins” had largely been captured. Future uplift required:
-
Smarter prioritisation
-
Stronger governance
-
More complex experimentation
-
Cross-team alignment
-
Increased personalisation sophistication
At the same time, velocity was impacted by developer resourcing constraints, requiring tighter focus on high-value tests.
The question became:
How do we sustain meaningful revenue uplift while increasing program maturity?
With quick wins captured, I used AI to mine past test results, Contentsquare insights and customer feedback for patterns, helping surface higher-value hypotheses faster with less developer time spent on low-impact ideas.
My Role
Within this multi-year program, I operated at the intersection of:
-
UX strategy
-
Hypothesis-driven experimentation
-
Personalisation design
-
Workshop facilitation
-
Governance alignment
-
Cross-functional collaboration
-
AI-assisted research synthesis and hypothesis generation
-
Design of ML personalisation and generative AI experiments
I contributed not only to test design, but to shaping how experimentation was prioritised, structured, and scaled.
The impact extended beyond individual tests, into building a disciplined experimentation culture that balanced commercial growth with user experience integrity.
Phase 1: Foundations (FY22-23)
In FY22-23, the experimentation program was still maturing.
The program target was $11.4m, delivering $10.9m across 7 active months. The focus during this period was not only revenue generation, but building:
-
Measurement frameworks
-
Ramp governance
-
Significance standards
-
Code review processes
-
Cross-team enablement
The team implemented a defined measurement framework covering primary/secondary metrics, sample size estimation, significance testing, and revenue estimation alignment with Finance.
My contribution during this phase included shaping UX-driven hypotheses, contributing to early test ideation, and working within a disciplined ramp framework that prioritised low-risk rollouts.
This phase built the experimentation muscle.
As generative AI tools emerged, I began using ChatGPT to draft hypothesis statements and test briefs to a consistent template, which helped standardise documentation as the measurement framework took shape.
Phase 2: Scaling & Maturity (FY24)
By FY24, the program had moved beyond foundational capability and into scaled commercial impact.
The revised annual revenue target of $48.4m was exceeded, delivering $49.4m in Q3 and $50.7m by Q4.
Performance improvements included:
-
16.7% increase vs FY23 performance
-
15.8% reduction in cost per test
-
~$27.7m in lost year-1 revenue mitigated by not committing underperforming tests
This is where the program shifted from “running tests” to operating with commercial discipline.
Key advancements included:
-
Deep dive journey-based ideation cycles
-
Integration of Contentsquare for faster insight velocity
-
GA4 transition and data integration uplift
-
Dynamic Yield algorithm sophistication for personalisation
My role increasingly focused on hypothesis framing, UX-led experimentation, behavioural insight integration, and ensuring test concepts aligned with both commercial and user intent metrics.
During the journey-based ideation cycles, I used ChatGPT to summarise Contentsquare findings and cluster friction points by journey stage, so workshops started from synthesised insight rather than raw data. I checked every theme against the source data before it shaped a hypothesis.
Phase 3: Commercial Discipline & Governance (FY25)
FY25 marked a governance inflection point.
45 tests were delivered, generating $42.2m in 12-month projected revenue against a $38.1m target, achieving 111% of annual target.
Performance maturity included:
-
22.2% increase vs FY24 program
-
25% reduction in cost per test
-
~$23.7m in lost revenue mitigated by not committing poor-performing tests
The team implemented refined prioritisation combining customer value, commercial impact, and capability scoring.
AI experimentation began with Shopping Muse, testing conversational product discovery. Despite strong engagement among high-intent users, overall adoption remained <1%, and scaling was responsibly halted.
This demonstrated evidence-based decision-making over hype-driven rollout.
I contributed through:
-
Designing urgency and social proof tests (e.g., PDP countdown timers, Top Rated tags)
-
Personalised homepage category row testing
-
Recommendation placement experimentation
-
Workshop facilitation for ideation alignment
I used AI to generate copy variants for urgency and social proof tests (countdown timers, Top Rated tags) and to stress-test hypotheses for unintended effects, such as urgency feeling manipulative, before they went into the backlog.
Phase 4: Centre of Excellence Vision (FY26)
By FY26, the ambition expanded beyond optimisation velocity into operating model maturity.
In H1 FY26:
-
14 tests delivered $25.1m in ramped revenue against a $30.2m target
-
57% experiment success rate
-
~$3.7m in lost revenue mitigated
The program formally defined a Centre of Excellence vision focused on:
-
Standardised rituals
-
Governance checkpoints
-
Centralised validation
-
Shared documentation
-
Upskilling across Digital
This marked a transition from centralised execution to hybrid decentralised enablement.
The optimisation function evolved into:
A commercial validation layer embedded across the digital value chain.
Personalisation & AI Integration
Across FY24–FY26, the program increasingly leveraged:
-
Dynamic Yield ML-driven recommendation engines
-
Mastercard data integration
-
Segment-specific personalisation
-
Journey-based algorithm testing
These initiatives focused on:
-
Combatting decision fatigue
-
Enhancing inspiration
-
Purposeful friction to improve CVR and AOV
The strategic direction aligned experimentation with Myer’s North Star of $1.5–2B+ online sales.
I used AI to draft standardised templates for hypotheses, test briefs and result summaries, supporting the shared documentation and upskilling goals of the Centre of Excellence.

Latest Experimentation Themes (FY25–FY26)
As the program matured, experimentation moved beyond incremental UX tweaks and into higher-leverage behavioural and personalisation strategies aligned with Myer’s commercial North Star.
1. Combatting Decision Fatigue
A key pillar of the FY25 strategy focused on reducing cognitive overload across the shopping journey.
This included:
-
Surfacing “Top Rated” indicators on PLPs to strengthen social proof
-
Introducing urgency messaging such as PDP countdown timers
-
Optimising product recommendation placements to guide faster decision-making
These tests demonstrated that behavioural cues, not just layout changes, materially influenced CVR and ATB.
The program increasingly leaned into psychology-informed experimentation.
2. Data-Driven Personalisation
Significant investment was made in maximising the value of Dynamic Yield and Mastercard-powered recommendation engines.
Recent initiatives focused on:
-
Personalised homepage category rows
-
Segment-specific algorithm optimisation
-
Testing “Visually Similar” and affinity-based recommendations
-
Search-triggered trending product suggestions
The emphasis shifted from generic optimisation to intent-driven personalisation, delivering the right products at the right time based on behavioural signals.
3. AI Exploration & Responsible Scaling
The team piloted Shopping Muse, a generative AI conversational shopping assistant.
While engaged users showed higher CVR and AOV, overall adoption remained below 1%, and commercial impact was neutral to slightly negative.
Rather than scaling prematurely, the recommendation was to reassess placement, value proposition, and integration into natural behaviours before further investment.
This reinforced a key principle of the program:
Evidence over trend-driven rollout.
4. Governance & CoE Maturity
In FY26, the experimentation function formally articulated a Centre of Excellence vision.
The focus expanded beyond running tests to:
-
Standardising rituals and documentation
-
Centralising validation checkpoints
-
Reducing test conflict through scheduling
-
Upskilling broader digital teams
-
Supporting decentralised execution with governance oversight
This marked a transition from centralised execution to scalable experimentation enablement.
Aggregate Impact (FY22–FY26)
Over four years, the experimentation program:
• Delivered well over $100m in projected incremental revenue
• Consistently exceeded revised revenue targets
• Reduced cost per test as maturity increased
• Mitigated tens of millions in negative revenue impact
• Increased experiment complexity and sophistication
• Embedded personalisation as a core commercial lever
• Transitioned toward a Centre of Excellence operating model
This wasn’t isolated optimisation work. It was building and maturing a revenue-driving system